Why not just use normal AI?
Fair questions. Ten honest answers.
What does it do?
Three things. Draft: start from a blank page and get back a policy written in the firm voice your MLRO already uses. Audit: upload what you have and get findings that cite the FCA source behind them, Final Notice, Dear CEO letter or Finalised Guidance. Enhance: receive a Word file with tracked changes, ready for your reviewers to accept, reject or comment.
Who is it for?
MLROs, heads of compliance and financial crime teams at banks, payments firms, fintechs, EMIs and every other regulated financial institution in the UK, EU and US. Built around UK AML first, and flexible across jurisdictions: if it is a regulated text, bring it.
Why is this better than just asking ChatGPT?
General AI writes what an AML policy usually sounds like. It will also confidently invent regulation that does not exist. Buxten is built for one job: it retrieves the actual primary sources first and drafts from them. With numerous testing and fine-tunings Buxten knows what to look for, and how to edit. Every finding arrives with a citation you can check. Plausible text is everywhere. Checkable text is Buxten.
Why is it better than other AI?
Focus is efficient. A general AI provider spends your tokens wandering across everything it knows. Buxten's engine goes straight to the relevant regulation, so every token works. The result: sharper answers at a fraction of the token cost, and far below the price of an external policy review. Your first run is free: bring a policy to a thirty minute call and watch what it finds.
How accurate is it?
Precision comes from scope. Buxten works in one domain, financial crime policy, with a defined risk perimeter. That focus lets it be exact where general models generalise. On top of that, every finding must cite its source and pass citation validation before you ever see it. Could output still be wrong? Possible, although highly unlikely. That is why every claim ships with its citation: verify, then rely.
Can we use our own documents and house style?
Yes. Make the model sound like your firm. Upload your AML, EDD, SAR or CIP documents and Buxten works on what you actually have, then hands back a Word file with tracked changes, in the voice your MLRO already signs off.
Do we get access to the sources?
You do. Buxten grants you access to the source of truth documents behind every finding, so your team can read the regulation itself and implement your own outcomes, not just ours.
How do you keep up with regulatory change?
Continuously. New Final Notices, Dear CEO letters and guidance flow into the source library as they land, and the index is rebuilt so citations always point at live material, never last year's understanding.
Who trains the model?
Specialists, not scrapers. Training examples are curated and reviewed internally by people who have written and audited real AML frameworks. Your documents stay out of it: client material is confidential and never used for training.
Does this replace my MLRO or compliance team?
No. It upgrades their week. Buxten does the retrieval, drafting and citation work in minutes, so your team spends its time on judgment instead of paperwork. Your MLRO still signs.
Buxten is in its testing stage and we are open for communication. Still unsure? Bring a policy. We’ll run it on the call.